We follow every input to where it can do damage
From entry point to point of impact.
We review your code, your infrastructure and your trust boundaries looking for real vulnerabilities, not deviations from a checklist. Every finding arrives with the trace to the file, the observed result, and the smallest change that fixes it.
Method
Review by attack class
Evidence
Traced to source
Validation
Adversarial
Severity
Likelihood × Impact
Attack classes
From injection and access control to supply chain and AI agents
Tests against production
We read your source; anything we run is sandboxed with no external network
Explicit verdicts
Confirmed, needs validation, or rejected. Never an unlabelled "maybe"
Findings with a trace
Every confirmation cites the file, the data path and the observed result
From your code to a mitigation plan in 3 stages
A non-intrusive process: we read the source, validate in isolation and deliver evidence. We never test against your production systems.
Map the architecture and its trust boundaries
You connect the repository in read-only mode. We identify which components trust which, where untrusted input enters, and which controls are supposed to stop it. That produces the coverage plan.
Hunt by attack class, then validate adversarially
Each attack class is reviewed separately against the source. Every candidate then goes to an independent reviewer whose job is to disprove it: whoever validates is never whoever found it.
A report built on evidence, not alerts
You get confirmed findings with their trace and observed result, the pending ones with the exact fact that is missing, hardening notes kept separate, and the real scope of what was reviewed.
The attack classes we hunt for in your code
This is not a scanner matching patterns. Each class is reviewed separately, following untrusted input from where it enters to where it does damage.
Injection and input handling
SQL, commands, templates, deserialization, path traversal, SSRF, indirect and second-order injection
Access control and authorization
Alternate paths with weaker permissions, bulk operations with no per-item check, endpoints that authenticate but never authorize
Authentication and sessions
JWT, OAuth/OIDC, SAML, MFA, passkeys, account recovery, API keys and mTLS
Business logic
Skippable state machines, race conditions with real impact (double-charge, double-approve), numeric and time-based manipulation
Tenant isolation
Cross-tenant leaks through cache, search, export, backup, restore, migration and deletion
Cryptography and secrets
Weak randomness, secrets in source or logs, missing HMAC, nonce reuse and timing side channels
Cloud and infrastructure as code
IAM and workload identity, containers and Kubernetes, serverless, ingress, and the configuration and secret lifecycle
Supply chain and release
Dependency resolution, CI pipelines, release signing and promotion, updates and plugins
Browser and client side
DOM XSS, prototype pollution, postMessage trust, CORS, service workers and UI redress
Protocols, RPC and messaging
gRPC, GraphQL, queues and brokers, webhooks, replay and transaction ordering
Resource exhaustion
Computational amplification, resource accumulation, quota abuse and operator-funded spend
AI and agent systems
Prompt injection, context and memory poisoning, over-permissioned tools and MCP trust
We also cover memory safety and binaries (C/C++/Rust, FFI, kernel) and desktop and mobile apps (deep links, webviews, local IPC) where they apply. Classes are chosen from your architecture: an upfront pass decides which ones fit, and the report states in writing which ones were left out.
SQL injection through a JWT claim
api/auth/session.ts · untrusted input → unparameterized query
Wildcard IAM role allows writing to another customer’s data
terraform/iam_policy.tf · tenant boundary
User enumeration via differing recovery-flow responses
api/password/reset.ts · response distinguishes "not found" from "no access"
Severity comes from likelihood × demonstrated impact, not from a checklist. A missing control that another layer already blocks is a hardening note, not a vulnerability.
Your executive security roadmap
No empty alerts, no generic lists. You get a summary your leadership understands and a technical breakdown your engineers can act on the same day.
Severity from demonstrated impact
Critical, high, medium, low or informational based on what was actually demonstrated. Severity can never exceed the observed impact, so what reads as urgent really is.
The smallest fix that works
For every confirmed finding: the invariant the code must enforce, the minimum change that enforces it, and the regression test. Concrete edits to your files, not generic advice.
Scope stated in writing
The report says what was reviewed, what was left out and what is still pending. One pass never exhausts a system, and we would rather you know than assume the rest is fine.
Download the sample report
A real audit, generalized: it keeps the severities and the reasoning, with no routes, code or reproduction steps from the audited client.
Plans built to scale
Buy a one-off deep audit, or fold recurring review into the repositories that matter most.
Audit Express
One-offBuilt for startups, MVPs raising a round, or critical production launches.
- check_circle Source review by attack class, validated in an isolated sandbox
- check_circle Technical report with trace, evidence and a proposed fix per finding
- check_circle Severity from likelihood × demonstrated impact
- check_circle List of pending leads with the exact missing fact
- check_circle Scope of up to 50,000 lines of code
Pro Continuous
RecurringRecurring reviews over a codebase that keeps changing, with direct support from senior engineers.
- verified Recurring passes: each one adds to cumulative coverage
- verified Prior findings re-validated whenever the relevant source changes
- verified Bi-weekly reports tracking coverage progress
- verified A proposed fix per finding, ready for your team to apply
- verified Monthly review session with a security engineer
- verified Priority support on Slack or Discord
Enterprise
TailoredFor large, multi-cloud systems or strict confidentiality requirements.
- check_circle Hybrid and multi-cloud infrastructure, with coverage split per subsystem
- check_circle Native and low-level modules: C/C++, Rust, FFI and kernel
- check_circle Runs inside your infrastructure: the code never leaves
- check_circle Deep passes with independent double verification
- check_circle Hands-on support for your team during remediation
Secure your infrastructure before a breach makes the decision for you
Book a preliminary review, no commitment. Together we define the scope, which attack classes apply to your architecture, and what to expect from the report.